(Onitsha Nigeria, July 22, 2016)-In line with our three core
advocacy objectives of ensuring at all times that human rights are extensively made
accessible to their holders/owners; protective for victims of their violations;
and accountability of the State and non-State actors over the perpetration and
commission of human rights abuses and other regime atrocities, irrespective of
class, religion, tribe or sex; it is our (Intersociety) firm
declaration that the Judicial Panel of Enquiry set up in January 2016 by the
Government of Kaduna State to look into the so called “Army-Shiite Clash”
(Shiite Genocide) of December 12-14, 2015 in Zaria, Kaduna State; is nothing
but an
act of uselessness and effort in futility. Fundamental flaws inherent
in the Panel’s constitution, composition, legal status, procedures, proceedings,
outcomes and enforceability are also basket-loaded.
To set the records straight,
there was no clash between the soldiers and members of Islamic Movement of
Nigeria (IMN) on 12th of December 2015, but purely a premeditated
and well coordinated State terror and genocide. Even the kangaroo Kaduna State
Judicial Panel of Enquiry admitted that “one army corporal was lynched while at
least 347 corpses of members of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria were massacred
by soldiers in the presence of its COAS and buried in mass graves”. Till date,
there is no evidence of violent uprising or mob-violence targeted at the
Nigerian Army or the convoy of its COAS, Lt Gen Turkur Buratai by the Islamic
Movement on the said date. Same is the case in the IPOB and its associates
peaceful assemblies and jubilation matches of 30th of August, 2nd
December and 17th December of 2015 in Onitsha as well as those of 18th
of January, 29th of January, 9th of February and 30th
of May 2016 in Aba, Nkpor, Onitsha and Asaba in which as much 250 unarmed and defenceless
activists were massacred with over 400 terminally shot, battered or lacerated.
The perpetrators of these two genocides are still on the prowl as we speak.
It is recalled that the genocidal
massacre was carried out on December 12, 2015 in the presence of the Chief of
Army Staff, Lt Gen Turkur Buratai and his convoy leading to massacre of
hundreds of Shiite members on the spot. The Shiite members were performing
their annual faith processions, using a major road in Zaria, leading to heavy
human traffic, which slowed down vehicular movements including the convoy of
the COAS, Lt General Turkur Buratai. The massacre was repeated on December 14,
2015 at the Shiite headquarters in Zaria during which hundreds of other Shiite
members were massacred, their headquarters raised and their leader, Mallam
Ibraheem El-Zakzaky shot, battered and abducted till date. A lot of 809 Shiite
members were killed or made to disappear till date, according to detailed
statistics and pictorial evidence released by the Sect. The Government of
Kaduna State later admitted burring 347 corpses in mass graves.
The Panel of Enquiry under
reference totally lacks local contents and fundamental
ingredients of enforceability and applicability. It is also procedurally
blundered, culprit-escapist and an enemy-visitor to two fundamental foundations
of the rule of law: nemo judex in sua causa (nobody should be a judge in his or her
own case or cause) and audi alteram partem (listen to the
other side or let the other side be heard as well). It must be clearly stated
that panels of enquiry generally speaking, are nothing more than fire brigade
approaches and soft landings for culprits. In most cases, they end up creating hyper-victimization.
Perpetrators of regime atrocities
recklessly use Panels of Enquiry to escape criminal responsibilities and where
any of them is rarely indicted; their white papers are hardly implemented or
enforced by the constituting authorities. Panels of Enquiry are also
holistically State-actor arrangements; designed in such a way that the
same human butchers and human rights abusers are invited to right their own
wrongs and sit over judgments in the same regime atrocities they are suspects
or committers, either vicariously or individually.
Therefore, in the case of the
Kaduna State Government Judicial Panel of Enquiry under reference, headed by
one Justice Muhammad Lawal-Garba, which had sat and wound up, the following
grave flaws abound in its constitution, composition, legal status, procedures,
proceedings, outcomes and enforceability: (a) the Kaduna State Government,
which constituted it is vicariously an interested and culpable party (a grave
violation of the principle of nemo judex in sua causa); (b) the victim-group
(Shiite Muslim Sect or Islamic Movement of Nigeria) and its leadership was
never represented or heard (a grave violation of the principle of audi alteram partem);(c) its
leader, Mallam Ibraheem, El-Zak-Zaky was shot, battered and lacerated and
thrown into illegal, unconstitutional, solitary and incommunicado detention
running into its eight month without trial (a grave violation of the 1999
Constitution and the Fundamental Human Rights Principles and Procedures).
Others are: (d) the
law under which the judicial panel of enquiry was set up is the law of Kaduna
State or a State law, which is inferior to federal law; (e) procedurally, the
law of a State (i.e. Kaduna State) and its sanction codes is rarely enforceable
against the federal authorities (i.e. army and its COAS) and where a State law
is in conflict with a federal law, the latter subsists and the former
disappears instantly (see Section 4(5) of the 1999 Constitution); (f) the
persons and institution (Nigerian Army and its COAS) responsible for the
genocide do not belong to the Government of Kaduna State, but to the Federal
Government of Nigeria; (g) the judicial panel of enquiry under reference was
solely designed to exonerate certain sacred cows or hit men of the Presidency
(i.e. Lt General Turkur Buratai) and hang culpable ropes around certain
sacrificial lambs such as the GOC, 1st Mechanized Division of the
Nigerian Army, Kaduna, Major Gen Adeniyi Oyebade; (h) the judicial panel of
enquiry can never address judicially and satisfactorily the regime atrocities
above mentioned or bring their perpetrators to criminal accountability or
ensure adequate justice for the victims and the society wronged and despaired;
(i) the judicial panel of enquiry did not apply the rule of law in its
procedures and proceedings.
The rest are: (j) the
judicial panel of enquiry was a desperate attempt by the authorities of the
Federal Government and the Government of Kaduna State to ensure that
perpetrators under their service and appointment escape international justice
and culpability by attempting to manipulate the internationally existing
principle of complimentarity, which instantly invokes international justice
attentions and sanctions against the culprits where it is found that the
Federal authorities in Nigeria are clearly unable and unwilling to apprehend
the culprits and bring them to internationally standardized justice.
And (k) under the international laws including
international customary, criminal, humanitarian, statute and human rights laws;
the principle of complimentarity (i.e. ability and willingness of a UN
Member-State to municipally address heinous crimes or grave regime atrocities
and hold their perpetrators accountable), a mere setting up of judicial or political panels of
enquiry by any UN Member-State in response to heinous crimes or regime
atrocities so committed such as the above mentioned; is not in any way amounted
to adhering strictly to the sacred
principle of willingness and ability of a UN Member-State, rather, it is
expressly factored into that of unwillingness and inability to act.
We hereby reject the outcomes of
the Kangaroo Judicial Panel of Enquiry under reference, particularly its
deliberate attempt to shift criminal responsibilities off the neck of the Chief
of Army Staff, Lt Gen Turkur Buratai. It is baffling as how a subordinate
officer will be made a sacrificial lamb in a genocidal operation carried out in
full presence and operational seal of his Chief of (Army) Staff. The Kangaroo
Judicial Panel of Enquiry and its constituting authority: the Government of
Kaduna State must also tell Nigerians and members of the international
community whether the COAS, Lt Gen Turkur Buratai was sleeping or in a comma
when the genocide took place. Assuming the COAS was drunk during the genocide,
he is still criminally liable (i.e. manslaughter) as well as professionally
liable for gross breach of soldiering code of conduct. The COAS remains number
one culprit in the genocide anytime any day.
Good a thing, such a genocidal
act is not statute bared or does not have time limits. There is no amount of
presidential protection or evidence destruction or threats that will make all
perpetrators of regime atrocities under the Buhari administration in Nigeria to
escape justice over heinous crimes they committed. The global advocacy watch is
already centered and beamed at all times in the direction of all of them
particularly the duo of former IGP, Solomon Arase and the COAS, Lt Gen Turkur
Buratai. Not even a thousand NGO and media image launderers so recruited can
save them. The spirits of over 1000 murdered innocent citizens under their
operational watch and directives have since been invoked to visit their
spiritual wraths against them without time bound.
Signed:
For: International Society for Civil Liberties & the Rule of Law
(Intersociety)
Emeka Umeagbalasi, Board Chairman (Criminologist & Graduate of
Security Studies)
Mobile Line: +2348174090052
Website: www.intersociety-ng.org
Barr Obianuju Joy Igboeli, Head, Civil Liberties & Rule of Law
Program
Mobile Line: +2348034186332
Email: igboeliobianuju@gmail.com
Post A Comment:
0 comments: